Background
Overview
Mineralogic Studies
Uranium Transport Studies
Isotope Studies
Peña Blanca Data in Yucca Mountain Performance
Assessment
Bibliography
Contact Us
SwRI Information
Home
|
|
Rock thin section of uranium ore
from Nopal I. Silicified breccia fragments are
cemented by a black-colored, fine-crystalline matrix
composed of uraninite intergrown with kaolinite.
Oxidation of the uraninite has led to formation of
yellow-colored uranyl minerals. Field of view is 18
mm across. |
 |
Uranium Mineralogy
Primary uranium mineralization (i.e.,
uraninite) is preserved in highly silicified portions of the
Nopal I deposit. The occurrence of uraninite at Nopal I is a
fortuitous analogy in relation to a Yucca Mountain HLW
repository because natural uraninite is a close structural
and compositional analog to spent nuclear fuel. The presence
of uraninite at Nopal I allows its alteration to secondary
uranium minerals to be examined and compared to the results
of oxidation experiments conducted using unirradiated UO2 or
spent fuel.
Information on uranium minerals found at
Nopal I, their paragenesis, the composition of Nopal I
uraninite, and a comparison of Nopal I uranium mineralogy to
nuclear fuel corrosion experiments was published in Applied
Geochemistry. The abstract for this article follows.
|
Applied Geochemistry, Vol. 9, pp.
713-732, 1994
Alteration of uraninite from the Nopal I
deposit, Peña Blanca District, Chihuahua,
Mexico, compared to degradation of spent nuclear
fuel in the proposed U.S. high-level nuclear
waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada
English C. Pearcy, James D. Prikryl, William M.
Murphy,
and Bret W. Leslie
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses
Southwest Research Institute
San Antonio, TX 78228-0510, U.S.A. |
Abstract
At the Nopal I uranium deposit, primary
uraninite (nominally UO2+x) has altered almost
completely to a suite of secondary uranyl
minerals. The deposit is located in a Basin and
Range horst composed of welded silicic tuff;
uranium mineralization presently occurs in a
chemically oxidizing and hydrologically
unsaturated zone of the structural block. These
characteristics are similar to those of the
proposed U.S. high-level nuclear waste (HLW)
repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.
Petrographic analyses indicate that residual
Nopal I uraninite is fine grained (5-10 microns)
and has a low trace element content (average
about 3 weight percent). These characteristics
compare well with spent nuclear fuel. The
oxidation and formation of secondary minerals
from the uraninite have occurred in an
environment dominated by components common in
host rocks of the Nopal I system (e.g. Si, Ca,
K, Na and H2O) and also common to Yucca
Mountain. In contrast, secondary phases in most
other uranium deposit form from elements largely
absent from spent fuel and from the Yucca
Mountain environment (e.g. Pb, P and V). The
oxidation of Nopal I uraninite and the sequence
of alteration products, their intergrowths and
morphologies are remarkably similar to those
observed in reported corrosion experiments using
spent fuel and unirradiated UO2 under conditions
intended to approximate those anticipated for
the proposed Yucca Mountain repository. The end
products of these reported laboratory
experiments and the natural alteration of Nopal
I uraninite are dominated by uranophane
[nominally Ca(UO2)2SiO2O7
· 6H2O] with lesser
amounts of soddyite [nominally (UO2)2SiO4.2H2O]
and other uranyl minerals. These similarities in
reaction product occurrence developed despite
the differences in time and physical-chemical
environment between Yucca Mountain-approximate
laboratory experiments and Yucca
Mountain-approximate uraninite alteration at
Nopal I, suggesting that the results may
reasonably represent phases likely to form
during long-term alteration of spent fuel in a
Yucca Mountain repository. From this analogy, it
may be concluded that the likely compositional
ranges of dominant spent fuel alteration phases
in the Yucca Mountain environment may be
relatively limited and may be insensitive to
small variations in system condition. |
|
The relatively simple
chemistry of the Nopal I system (predominantly
rhyolitic tuffs) and the youth of the deposit
has resulted in the formation of fewer uranium
minerals when compared to most other uranium
deposits that have undergone oxidative
alteration. A listing of the uranium minerals
found at Nopal I are shown in the accompanying
table. |
|
 |
| |
Modified from Pearcy et al.,
1994 |
The pargenesis of uranium minerals at
Nopal I is relatively simple consisting of primary uraninite
followed by uranyl oxide hydrates followed by uranyl
silicates. Paragenetic relationships between the uranium
phases at Nopal I are illustrated in the following photos:
 |
|
 |
|
Scanning electron
photomicrograph of uraninite (U) intergrown with
kaolinite (K). The primary mineralization at
Nopal I consists of a
uraninite-kaolinite-pyrite-quartz assemblage.
Texturally the assemblage consists of a matrix
of fine crystalline uraninite-kaolinite which
cements silicified breccia fragments. The dark
colored material at the top left is the border
of a breccia fragment. Pyrite crystals of
varying size and concentration occur within the
uraninite-kaolinite matrix. Scale - 0.045 mm
across |
|
Reflected light
photomicrograph showing an oxidation front in a
sample of Nopal I uranium ore. Uraninite (U)
intergrown with kaolinite (dark colored mineral)
is being oxidized to the uranyl silicate
soddyite (SO). Kaolinite is unaffected by the
alteration. Scale - 0.1 mm across |
 |
|
 |
|
Backscattered electron
photomicrograph of uraninite with a colloform
texture (C) lining open space between silicified
breccia fragments. Note the euhedral quartz
substrates (Q). The remaining open space is
filled by uranyl oxide hydrates [dehydrated
schoepite (DS)] and uranyl silicates [soddyite
(SO)]. Scale - 0.4 mm across |
|
Backscattered electron
photomicrograph of uranium phases filling open
space between breccia fragments. Granular
uraninite (G) composed of fine crystalline
uraninite intergrown with kaolinite is followed
by colloform uraninite (C). The remaining open
space is filled by dehydrated schoepite (DS).
Euhedral quartz crystals (Q) act as substrates
for uraninite formation. Scale - 0.4 mm across |
 |
|
 |
|
Plane light photomicrograph
of uranium phases filling open space. Open space
is filled by uranyl oxide hydrates: ianthinite
(IA) followed by schoepite (S) and dehydrated
schoepite (DS). Uranophane (UR) replaces all
three uranyl oxide hydrates. Note the thin black
rim of colloform uraninite (C) preserved along
the margin of the granular material. Scale - 0.8
mm across |
|
Transmitted light
photomicrograph of red-colored ianthinite
filling open space within a breccia fragment.
The ianthinite is being replaced by
yellow-colored schoepite and uranophane. Scale -
0.8 mm across |
 |
|
 |
|
Transmitted light
photomicrograph of radiating clusters of
intergrown schoepite and uranophane. This is a
replacement texture after colloform uraninite.
Scale - 2.6 mm across |
|
Transmitted light
photomicrograph of schoepite (S) and uranophane
(UR) filling an open void. Schoepite occurs at
the margin of the void and follows colloform
uraninite (C). Uranophane occurs in the middle
of the void and replaces schoepite. Scale - 0.8
mm across |
 |
|
 |
|
Transmitted light
photomicrograph of uranophane and
beta-uranophane filling open space in fractured
breccia. Beta-uranophane consists of the
coarser, yellow-colored crystals, whereas
uranophane is composed of finer, blue-green
crystals. Scale - 2.6 mm across |
|
Transmitted light
photomicrograph of uranophane replacing
components of the primary mineral assemblage at
Nopal I. Uranophane partially fills open spaces
left by dissolution of cubic uraninite or
pyrite. The fine crystalline material
surrounding the replaced uraninite or pyrite was
originally uraninite intergrown with kaolinite.
The uraninite has been replaced by
uranophane. Scale - 2.6 mm across |
 |
|
|
|
Transmitted light
photomicrograph of clusters of acicular weeksite
crystals within a fracture in brecciated tuff.
Scale - 1.3 mm across |
|
|
Non-Uranium Mineralogy
Studies of non-uranium minerals at Nopal
I have been utilized to evaluate mechanisms and timing of U
transport at the deposit. For example, dating of U-rich opal
and calcite precipitated on and adjacent to the uranium
deposit has documented water movement and U mobilization at
54 ka (Pearcy et al., 1994).
|
Oxidation of pyrite has lead to
the formation of iron oxides, iron hydroxides, and
sulfates both within and outside the uranium
deposit. A zone within the interior of the deposit
is characterized by no observable U minerals and
abundant alunite [KAl3(SO4)2(OH)6]. The conditions
under which alunite forms (oxidizing, low pH) are
also conditions that tend to mobilize U. A major
fracture set that crosscuts the deposit contains
goethite, hematite, amorphous Fe-oxyhydroxides, and
jarosite [KFe3(SO4)2(OH)6] produced by chemical
weathering of pyrite (Prikryl et al., 1997). The
goethite, hematite, and amorphous Fe-oxyhydroxides
within this fracture contain anomalous U
concentrations (e.g., several hundred to several
thousand ppm U). U concentrations in these minerals
decreases with distance from the deposit which
strongly suggests that U was mobilized and
transported away from the deposit. |
|
 |
| |
Photograph of infilling material
and host tuff from a major fracture which crosscuts
the ore deposit. The fracture contains Fe-oxides
(hematite and goethite) that often cement tuff
fragments. Jarosite crystals line the large open
void within the fracture. |
 |
|
 |
|
Reflected light photomicrograph
of fracture-infilling materials. Hematite (H) has a
colloform texture and grows into open space from
goethite (G) and amorphous Fe-oxyhydroxide (A)
substrates. Jarosite (J) grows from hematite
substrates into open voids. Field of view is 0.5 mm
wide. |
|
Reflected light photomicrograph
of goethite (G) replacing cubic pyrite. Open voids
(V) left by pyrite dissolution are partially filled
by jarosite (J). Field of view is 0.5 mm wide. |
References
Pearcy,
E.C., J.D. Prikryl, W.M. Murphy, and B.W. Leslie, 1994,
Alteration of uraninite from the Nopal I deposit, Peña
Blanca district, Chihuahua, Mexico, compared to degradation
of spent nuclear fuel in the proposed US high-level nuclear
waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Applied
Geochemistry, Vol. 9, p. 713-732.
Prikryl, J.D., D.A. Pickett, W.M.
Murphy, and E.C. Pearcy, 1997, Migration behavior of
naturally-occurring radionuclides at the Nopal I uranium
deposit, Chihuahua, Mexico, Journal of Contaminant
Hydrology, Vol. 26, p. 61-69.
For more
information about the Peña
Blanca Natural Analog Project at SwRI or how you can
contract with SwRI, please contact
James D. Prikryl at
jprikryl@swri.org, or call (210) 522-5667.
|
|