|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Natural analog studies at Peña Blanca have provided information for recent performance assessments for the proposed geologic repository at Yucca Mountain.
Application of Peña Blanca data to Yucca Mountain performance assessment has focused primarily on issues of mineral paragenesis resulting from alteration of natural uraninite, source term modeling, and radionuclide transport. Applications have been primarily qualitative. For example, the distribution of uranium in and around fractures at the Nopal I deposit, as described in Pearcy et al. (1995), was used to evaluate matrix diffusion and its significance as a retardartion mechanism in performance modeling of radionuclide transport (CNWRA®, 1997).
The use of Peña Blanca information in Yucca Mountain performance assessment is summarized in articles appearing in the Proceedings of the Eighth Natural Analouge Working Group (NAWG) meeting (see Murphy et al., in press, in the reference section) and Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIII, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings. The abstract for the latter article is shown below.
The strongest contributions of Peña Blanca analog data to Yucca Mountain performance assessments to date have been provided by the observed correspondence in the mineral products formed by oxidation of spent nuclear fuel in laboratory studies and of uraninite in the Peña Blanca system. These observations have been used as a basis to include the secondary uranyl minerals schoepite, soddyite, uranophane, and Na-boltwoodite in reactive transport simulations for the Department of Energy (DOE) Total System Performance Assessment - Viability Assessment (DOE, 1998; TRW, 1998) to predict the evolution of water chemistry resulting from geochemical interactions in emplacement drifts.
In the recent NRC Total-system Performance Assessment for the Yucca Mountain repository (CNWRA, 1998; NRC, 1999a, 1999b), the sensitivity of performance results was tested using an alternate source term model based on the maximum average oxidation rate of uraninite estimated for the Nopal I uranium deposit and scaled to the proposed repository inventory. Results of this alternate source term model are published in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings. The abstract for the article follows.
Observations relating to radionuclide transport at Peña Blanca have been recognized as analogous to potential radionuclide transport in the Yucca Mountain system. For example, the importance of flow and radionuclide transport in fractures is strongly supported by the distribution of uranium surrounding the Nopal I deposit (Pearcy et al., 1995). The association of uranium with fracture filling iron oxides and iron oxyhydroxides at Peña Blanca highlights the potential importance of sorption/coprecipitation on oxide mineralization in fractures as a retardation mechanism for radionuclide transport (Prikryl et al., 1997). Although direct use of radionuclide transport data from Peña Blanca are absent in present performance assessments, these studies have contributed to conceptual modeling for performance assessments for Yucca Mountain. In addition, uranium series isotopic studies at Peña Blanca (Pickett and Murphy, 1997) have an untapped potential for applications in performance assessment.
ReferencesCNWRA, 1997, Detailed Review of Selected Aspects of Total System Performance Assessment - 1995, R.G. Baca and M.S. Jarzemba (editors), CNWRA Letter Report to NRC, Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX. CNWRA, 1998, Total-system Performance Assessment (TPA) Version 3.2 Code: Module Descriptions and User's Guide, Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX. Department of Energy, 1998, Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain Total System Performance Assessment, DOE/RW-0508, v. 3, Department of Energy, Las Vegas, NV. Murphy, W.M., D.A. Pickett, E.C. Pearcy, and D.R. Turner, 2000, Peña Blanca natural analog data in recent performance assessment models for the proposed geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, in Eighth EC Natural Analouge Working Group Meeting Proceedings, European Commission, Luxembourg, in press. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1999a, NRC Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for a Proposed HLW Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Using TPA 3.1 Volume 1: Conceptual Models and Data, (NUREG-1668, 1, 1999). Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1999b, NRC Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for a Proposed HLW Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Using TPA 3.1 Results and Conclusions (NUREG-1668, 2, 1999). Pearcy, E.C., J.D. Prikryl, and B.W. Leslie, 1995, Uranium transport through fractured silicic tuff and relative retention in areas with distinct fracture characteristics, Applied Geochemistry, Vol. 10, p. 685-704. Pickett, D.A., and W.M. Murphy, 1997, Isotopic constraints on radionuclide transport at Peña Blanca, in Seventh EC Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting, H. Von Maravic and J. Smellie, eds., EUR 17851 EN, European Commission, Luxembourg, p. 113-122. Prikryl, J.D., D.A. Pickett, W.M. Murphy, and E.C. Pearcy, 1997, Migration behavior of naturally-occurring radionuclides at the Nopal I uranium deposit, Chihuahua, Mexico, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Vol. 26, p. 61-69. TRW, 1998, Total System Performance Assessment - Viability Assessment (TSPA-VA) Analyses Technical Basis Document, TRW Environmental Safety Systems Inc., Las Vegas, NV, B00000000-01717-4301-00004 Rev. 01.
For more information about the
Peña Blanca Natural Analog Project at SwRI or how you
can contract with SwRI, please contact
James D. Prikryl at
jprikryl@swri.org, or call (210) 522-5667. |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
| Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses | Geosciences and Engineering Division | SwRI Home | |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Southwest Research Institute® (SwRI®), headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, is a multidisciplinary, independent, nonprofit, applied engineering and physical sciences research and development organization with 12 technical divisions. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
September 16, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||